OHbaby! Forums : Not guilty.. https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Sat, 04 Apr 2026 09:06:26 +0000 Tue, 27 May 2008 17:03:09 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=17492 <![CDATA[OHbaby! Forums]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_images/web_wiz_forums.png https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/ <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : NeoshasMummy wrote: The whole...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395891&title=not-guilty#395891 Author: caitlynsmygirl
Subject: 17492
Posted: 27 May 2008 at 5:03pm

Originally posted by NeoshasMummy NeoshasMummy wrote:



The whole thing makes me sick, there are 2 of her other older children living here in Gisborne, but apparently chris is going for custody of the "one surviving child" that headline sent shivers down my spine!


yeah...whole thing makes me sick too
I saw in the paper that she wants to get custody of the other kids, two or three who she hasnt seen in 5 years, great, completly disrupt their lives too.Im sorry , but SELFISH ! ]]> Tue, 27 May 2008 17:03:09 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395891&title=not-guilty#395891 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Well at one stage I had heard...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395766&title=not-guilty#395766 Author: NeoshasMummy
Subject: 17492
Posted: 27 May 2008 at 3:31pm

Well at one stage I had heard that a ex boyfriend of the mothers had said that she admitted that she did it to them and Chris shouldnt go to jail for it. When he went to the cops they said they had no proof that this was said. hmmmm dodgy

what about the reports from the nurses in the hospital that the mother was calm and very uninterested in the whole process why her kids were dying, she even answered a cell phone call walked out of the room and was laughing on the phone!!!

The whole thing makes me sick, there are 2 of her other older children living here in Gisborne, but apparently chris is going for custody of the "one surviving child" that headline sent shivers down my spine!]]> Tue, 27 May 2008 15:31:01 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395766&title=not-guilty#395766 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : i never thought Chris did it ,...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395654&title=not-guilty#395654 Author: caitlynsmygirl
Subject: 17492
Posted: 27 May 2008 at 1:19pm

i never thought Chris did it , BUT I think his "taking the rap for it " is betraying the boys.
I guess in the strange world of the Kahui's , its seen as brave-i just see it as another way they have let the babies down.
Every single person in that house (apart from the 1 year old ) should be held accountable , if your an adult, whether they are yours or not, you see a child being abused, you have an obligation to do right by the child and stop it happening,3 months, what could any child possibly do at 3 months to warrant that amount (or any amount ) of torture and abuse?

as for the lawyer thing-well if your a defence lawyer your paid to do a job , it doesnt mean they genuinely think your innocent (though i do believe Kahui's lawyer really did) my friends murderer had a lawyer , of course, and i always wonder if he really believed a word of what he was saying during the trial-whether he did or not,his job was to get his client off (he didnt though, ha 18 years,good job , not good enough) just like Chris's lawyer.

And Emma,who was Harder /harding? when he was at home? what he get disbarred for ?
]]> Tue, 27 May 2008 13:19:19 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395654&title=not-guilty#395654 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : No, I must have missed that one?...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395637&title=not-guilty#395637 Author: Maya
Subject: 17492
Posted: 27 May 2008 at 1:07pm

No, I must have missed that one? I read the background one in the Weekend Herald review section. Makes me mad that she even *gets* media coverage ]]> Tue, 27 May 2008 13:07:11 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395637&title=not-guilty#395637 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Did you read the Macysna (sp)...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395225&title=not-guilty#395225 Author: .Mel
Subject: 17492
Posted: 26 May 2008 at 9:41pm

Did you read the Macysna (sp) World one  Made me even angrier!

]]> Mon, 26 May 2008 21:41:10 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395225&title=not-guilty#395225 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I read that too, and wondered...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395213&title=not-guilty#395213 Author: Maya
Subject: 17492
Posted: 26 May 2008 at 9:36pm

I read that too, and wondered to myself how thick she thinks the rest of the world are?]]> Mon, 26 May 2008 21:36:00 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395213&title=not-guilty#395213 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I am so angry at this woman at...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395056&title=not-guilty#395056 Author: .Mel
Subject: 17492
Posted: 26 May 2008 at 8:07pm

I am so angry at this woman at the moment. I can't believe the absolute crap that she is spinning to the media at the moment.

Macsyna King says she is a mother "haunted" by the deaths of her twin boys Chris and Cru Kahui, and she will not rest until "who" or "what" killed them is found

What the fark ever!!!!

]]> Mon, 26 May 2008 20:07:36 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395056&title=not-guilty#395056 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Yep, baby Xavier is OK. Not sure...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395044&title=not-guilty#395044 Author: Maya
Subject: 17492
Posted: 26 May 2008 at 8:00pm

Yep, baby Xavier is OK. Not sure of the long term damage, but he did survive and he's been taken into care, just like his siblings ]]> Mon, 26 May 2008 20:00:26 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=395044&title=not-guilty#395044 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : That&#039;s so sad emma. Any news...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=394994&title=not-guilty#394994 Author: LJsmum
Subject: 17492
Posted: 26 May 2008 at 7:15pm

That's so sad emma. Any news on if the 6 week old baby survived.

I think the mother did it. Hope the police some how find new evidence and can try her.

Poor babies thaty never had a chance. ]]> Mon, 26 May 2008 19:15:42 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=394994&title=not-guilty#394994 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : As an aside, this baby is a cousin...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=393095&title=not-guilty#393095 Author: Maya
Subject: 17492
Posted: 24 May 2008 at 2:12pm

As an aside, this baby is a cousin of Chris'. Goes to show what a lovely family they are.
]]> Sat, 24 May 2008 14:12:39 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=393095&title=not-guilty#393095 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Yup, the third one was stillborn....]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=393068&title=not-guilty#393068 Author: Maya
Subject: 17492
Posted: 24 May 2008 at 1:35pm

Yup, the third one was stillborn.]]> Sat, 24 May 2008 13:35:03 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=393068&title=not-guilty#393068 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Yes this is true. ]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=393062&title=not-guilty#393062 Author: BuzzyBee
Subject: 17492
Posted: 24 May 2008 at 1:26pm

Yes this is true.]]> Sat, 24 May 2008 13:26:10 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=393062&title=not-guilty#393062 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Holy moly, I never knew that the...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392973&title=not-guilty#392973 Author: pepsi
Subject: 17492
Posted: 24 May 2008 at 10:39am

Holy moly, I never knew that the Kahui "twins" were actually 2 surviving triplets!! Is this true?

Linky]]> Sat, 24 May 2008 10:39:15 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392973&title=not-guilty#392973 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I always thought it was the mother...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392463&title=not-guilty#392463 Author: WRXnKids
Subject: 17492
Posted: 23 May 2008 at 5:52pm

I always thought it was the mother but as the paper i read said the police would be stupid to charge her with it now unless they can find new evidence otherwise defending her would be too easy as they could use the same defence as Chris had. There is no evidence she wasnt there when the children were injured.

Although hearing that the house was fill of benefit funded drug and alcohol fulled parties is what pissed me off the most why do people who waste their benefit money still receive it???? Maybe they should hand out the benefit in grocery vouchers with the rest being paid directly to the service companies ie phone power rent. I know not everyone abuses the goverment payments but the people who do need a wake up call]]> Fri, 23 May 2008 17:52:11 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392463&title=not-guilty#392463 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I was rapt he was found not guilty,...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392405&title=not-guilty#392405 Author: CuriousG
Subject: 17492
Posted: 23 May 2008 at 4:36pm

I was rapt he was found not guilty, I never thought he did it. ]]> Fri, 23 May 2008 16:36:20 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392405&title=not-guilty#392405 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Although I must say (and this...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392346&title=not-guilty#392346 Author: Maya
Subject: 17492
Posted: 23 May 2008 at 3:53pm

Although I must say (and this will be the only thing I *ever* say in his defence!) that poor guy never had a chance. The way he was brought up, he was never going to have the opportunity to make something of himself, and that is the saddest part. When your upbringing is that dysfunctional, it's almost inevitable that it will be a vicious cycle.]]> Fri, 23 May 2008 15:53:11 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392346&title=not-guilty#392346 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Mum2Lucas wrote: The part that...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392344&title=not-guilty#392344 Author: Maya
Subject: 17492
Posted: 23 May 2008 at 3:49pm

Originally posted by Mum2Lucas Mum2Lucas wrote:


The part that I think is unfair is the fact that he was dragged through such a huge ordeal & found 'not guilty' YET he will live with the label of 'child abuser' for the rest of his life.



If the hat fits...

]]> Fri, 23 May 2008 15:49:53 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392344&title=not-guilty#392344 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Kels wrote:I think the mother...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392339&title=not-guilty#392339 Author: Maya
Subject: 17492
Posted: 23 May 2008 at 3:46pm

Originally posted by Kels Kels wrote:

I think the mother did it. It was never proven that the father was even there when they were injured. Yes I think someone  should do time for it for justice for the boys but I dont believe in convicting an innocent man just because he was an easy target. Yes  he has duty of care for his kids but so did the mother not to mention all the adults that were in the house at the time.



I absolutely agree that every single adult in the house at the time is, to some degree, responsible for what happened, and I think they should all be held accountable, at the very least for the tiki tour they lead the police on in the early weeks after it happened. I am disgusted at the way the Police handled it then, and they don't seem to have improved any since then.

I think to describe Sonny as innocent is a bit liberal tho. OK so he's not guilty of doing the damage himself but IMHO the space between guilty and innocent is a very, very murky shade of grey. He could have stopped the injuries from occuring, failing that, he could have gotten medical care for them sooner. Choices have consequences, he made some poor choices and now he has to live with the consequences of those choices.

Edited coz I clearly can't spell consequences...

Edited by Maya]]> Fri, 23 May 2008 15:46:14 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=392339&title=not-guilty#392339 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Yes someone should pay for whats...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391970&title=not-guilty#391970 Author: ooEvaoo
Subject: 17492
Posted: 23 May 2008 at 10:22am

Yes someone should pay for whats happened, but the Police will never change their mind on who they think the killer was, and thats why they won't pursue this case any further. How sad that they are willing to give up like that. I always believed that Chris was innocent. Being so young and having an older partner I'm sure he felt obligated, and that it was the "man" thing to do, to take the wrap for what happened to his boys. He neglected his sons that is something I will not argue, everyone who was in contact with those boys neglected them. He will always live with this hanging over his head, he lost 2 children, and was made a spectacle in front of the nation. I don't even think he's really had any time to grieve for his sons. Fathers are not always the bad guys in family violence. I have no doubt in my minds that the mother played a huge role in the death of those boys. You can not tell me that being on P doesn't bring out a very ugly monster in a person. I know how destructive P is and how warped the mind becomes on it. Not from personal experience, I would rather die than put that s%&t in my body, but many people around me have done it and it is not easy to come back from. For those boys, heaven is the best place for them to be, no baby deserves to live in such a neglectful, abusive enviroment. God now has them and I think that is probably the only comfort out of this whole ordeal.]]> Fri, 23 May 2008 10:22:05 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391970&title=not-guilty#391970 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I think everyone in that house...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391886&title=not-guilty#391886 Author: grrrgrrrr
Subject: 17492
Posted: 23 May 2008 at 9:35am

I think everyone in that house was responsible.]]> Fri, 23 May 2008 09:35:21 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391886&title=not-guilty#391886 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Maya wrote: Mum2Lucas wrote: The...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391638&title=not-guilty#391638 Author: BuzzyBee
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 9:53pm

Originally posted by Maya Maya wrote:

Originally posted by Mum2Lucas Mum2Lucas wrote:


The police HAD to find a scapegoat for the crime, and unfortunately he was taken down. Poor guy will have to live with this for the rest of his life.


With all due respect, he was their father and he was there when they were injured. Whether he did it or not, he had a duty of care to those boys and as far as I'm concerned I hope he DOES live with it for the rest of his life, he certainly deserves to.



I agree that he WILL live with this for the rest of his life regardless. He lost his two precious sons in the process.

The part that I think is unfair is the fact that he was dragged through such a huge ordeal & found 'not guilty' YET he will live with the label of 'child abuser' for the rest of his life.

Very pi$$ed that someone walks free & I also agree that regardless of whether he was guilty of hurting those boys or not, to some extent he must have been aware that SOMETHING was going on & he did sit back and let it happen - that he IS guilty of. He definitely failed his sons in that respect.

Edited by Mum2Lucas]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 21:53:24 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391638&title=not-guilty#391638 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Kels wrote:I think the mother...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391579&title=not-guilty#391579 Author: BuzzyBee
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 9:14pm

Originally posted by Kels Kels wrote:

I think the mother did it. It was never proven that the father was even there when they were injured. Yes I think someone should do time for it for justice for the boys but I dont believe in convicting an innocent man just because he was an easy target. Yes he has duty of care for his kids but so did the mother not to mention all the adults that were in the house at the time.



Nicely put Kels ...and I totally agree with everything you said above.]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 21:14:17 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391579&title=not-guilty#391579 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I think the mother did it. It...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391516&title=not-guilty#391516 Author: Kels
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 8:44pm

I think the mother did it. It was never proven that the father was even there when they were injured. Yes I think someone  should do time for it for justice for the boys but I dont believe in convicting an innocent man just because he was an easy target. Yes  he has duty of care for his kids but so did the mother not to mention all the adults that were in the house at the time.

]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 20:44:48 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391516&title=not-guilty#391516 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Also it must have been a pretty...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391505&title=not-guilty#391505 Author: Paws
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 8:36pm

Also it must have been a pretty convincing case for the jury to take 10 mins in deliberations. Now that did surprise me! We took about 8 hours!!!]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 20:36:36 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391505&title=not-guilty#391505 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Mum2Lucas wrote: Unless you&#039;re...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391500&title=not-guilty#391500 Author: Paws
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 8:34pm

Originally posted by Mum2Lucas Mum2Lucas wrote:



Unless you're on the jury and have had all the evidence laid out in front of you I say you can't judge. But I definitely think that the mother has a lot to answer for.


I definetly agree with that! Once you've served on a jury it really opens your eyes to how the judicial (sp??) system can fall down and fail...whether there he is in part is guilty is irrelvant...the jury's duty is based on what evidence the crown and defense bring...]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 20:34:28 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391500&title=not-guilty#391500 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I&#039;m not surprised abot the...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391380&title=not-guilty#391380 Author: lizzle
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 7:29pm

I'm not surprised abot the non-guilty thing either. there was too much circumstantial evidence. however, the thought that they all just walk away....ick. to say the least. but then i suppose if you can do that to a child, you would also be the kind of person to be able to walk away and feel ok.
At school worship we are talking about forgiveness. don't know how people do it in cases like this]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 19:29:34 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391380&title=not-guilty#391380 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Oh and no surprises here that...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391368&title=not-guilty#391368 Author: Maya
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 7:21pm

Oh and no surprises here that he was found not guilty, reasonable doubt and all, but I am just incredibly sad for those poor wee boys who died for nothing.]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 19:21:04 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391368&title=not-guilty#391368 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Mum2Lucas wrote: The police...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391365&title=not-guilty#391365 Author: Maya
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 7:19pm

Originally posted by Mum2Lucas Mum2Lucas wrote:


The police HAD to find a scapegoat for the crime, and unfortunately he was taken down. Poor guy will have to live with this for the rest of his life.


With all due respect, he was their father and he was there when they were injured. Whether he did it or not, he had a duty of care to those boys and as far as I'm concerned I hope he DOES live with it for the rest of his life, he certainly deserves to.

Originally posted by mum2lucas mum2lucas wrote:

He has a very reputable lawyer, she has gone to lengths to ensure his innocence is proven, she wouldn't have done so if he was guilty of committing this crime.


In theory. But he's on legal aid and you can bet your bottom dollar he wouldn't have gotten such a reputable lawyer were it not such a high profile case. If he had been your average wife beater or drunk he would have got the Duty Solicitor for his first court appearance and been stuck with them. It's always amusing to see the high profile lawyers come out of the woodwork when these big cases come up: Comeskey, Dhyrberg, Harder.... oops no, sorry he got disbarred

Sorry, I am just a bit of a cynic about the whole case...]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 19:19:39 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391365&title=not-guilty#391365 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I always thought he was NOT guilty...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391339&title=not-guilty#391339 Author: BuzzyBee
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 6:52pm

I always thought he was NOT guilty ...

The police HAD to find a scapegoat for the crime, and unfortunately he was taken down. Poor guy will have to live with this for the rest of his life.

He has a very reputable lawyer, she has gone to lengths to ensure his innocence is proven, she wouldn't have done so if he was guilty of committing this crime.

Unless you're on the jury and have had all the evidence laid out in front of you I say you can't judge. But I definitely think that the mother has a lot to answer for.]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 18:52:03 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391339&title=not-guilty#391339 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : That really sucks....maybe the...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391293&title=not-guilty#391293 Author: Paws
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 5:37pm

That really sucks....maybe the crown doesn't have enough evidence to charge the mother or the police don't have enough to lay charges. ]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 17:37:07 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391293&title=not-guilty#391293 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I was just on NZ herald. com and...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391286&title=not-guilty#391286 Author: Henna79
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 5:30pm

I was just on NZ herald. com and it says no charges will be laid against Macsyna so I guess that no one is going to be accountable at this stage. ]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 17:30:42 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391286&title=not-guilty#391286 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : seems like they will be... just...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391281&title=not-guilty#391281 Author: Bizzy
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 5:26pm

seems like they will be... just read that the police will not be laying any further charges!!!!

Now that makes me very angry!!!! ]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 17:26:40 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391281&title=not-guilty#391281 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Surely someone heeds to be made...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391273&title=not-guilty#391273 Author: peachy
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 5:16pm

Surely someone heeds to be made accountable though? They can't all walk away scott free can they?

Poor babies ]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 17:16:42 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391273&title=not-guilty#391273 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I wasn&#039;t particularly surprised....]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391262&title=not-guilty#391262 Author: Bobbie
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 5:03pm

I wasn't particularly surprised. I've always wondered if it was actually the Mum who did it.]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 17:03:04 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391262&title=not-guilty#391262 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : Yeah I&#039;m thinking the same...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391251&title=not-guilty#391251 Author: .Mel
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 4:48pm

Yeah I'm thinking the same as you Paws regarding the mother.  I don't know how she can live with herself.]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 16:48:34 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391251&title=not-guilty#391251 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I&#039;m not shocked, remember...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391238&title=not-guilty#391238 Author: Paws
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 4:31pm

I'm not shocked, remember it is up to the crown to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" which is a very high burden of proof. It almost sounds like it didn't take much for the defense to be able to bring in witnesses who could give that reasonable doubt. It's not actually up to the defense to prove innocence.

Sounds like they would have a good case against the mum...hopefully another trial will be brought.

Edited by Paws]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 16:31:05 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391238&title=not-guilty#391238 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : You are right Deb, surprised is...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391236&title=not-guilty#391236 Author: mummy_becks
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 4:26pm

You are right Deb, surprised is a better word.

]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 16:26:53 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391236&title=not-guilty#391236 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : wow - i wonder if they will go...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391177&title=not-guilty#391177 Author: Bizzy
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 3:40pm

wow - i wonder if they will go after the mother for it now!?

i'm not shocked, a bit surprised maybe.

Edited by Bizzy]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 15:40:12 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391177&title=not-guilty#391177 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : I saw that as well - all the rest...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391169&title=not-guilty#391169 Author: mummy_becks
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 3:36pm

I saw that as well - all the rest were budget stories. I am shocked that he was found not guilty.

]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 15:36:54 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391169&title=not-guilty#391169 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : not many news stories would outdo...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391133&title=not-guilty#391133 Author: ElfsMum
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 3:19pm

not many news stories would outdo the budget! ]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 15:19:09 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391133&title=not-guilty#391133 <![CDATA[Not guilty.. : i know someone posted it somewhere...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391131&title=not-guilty#391131 Author: ElfsMum
Subject: 17492
Posted: 22 May 2008 at 3:18pm

i know someone posted it somewhere but cant find the thread... here is the news..

http://nz.news.yahoo.com/080522/3/5k3y.html]]> Thu, 22 May 2008 15:18:44 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17492&PID=391131&title=not-guilty#391131